For video, you can still get reasonably tight depth of field with good prime lenses, but focus is easier to control. It offers less bokeh and light-gathering capability than APS-C and full frame, but allows for smaller and lighter cameras and lenses. Micro Four Thirds (17.3 x 13mm), a format shared by Panasonic and Olympus, is the next step down in sensor size. With a sensor size the same as movie cameras, it's ideal for shooting video, and it’s easier to hold focus than with full-frame cameras. It's cheaper than full frame, both for the camera body and lenses, but still brings most of the advantages like decent bokeh, high ISOs for low-light shooting and relatively high resolution. The next size category is APS-C (around 23.5 x 15.6mm for most models and 22.2 x 14.8mm for Canon), offered on Fujifilm's X Series lineup, Canon’s R10 and R50 and the Nikon Z50. This can also make video shooting difficult. While bokeh looks incredible at f/1.4, the depth of field is so razor thin that your subject's nose might be in focus but not their eyes. It's also the most expensive and finicky. At a size equivalent to 35mm film (36 x 24mm), it offers the best performance in terms of image quality, low-light capability and depth of field. In general, the larger the sensor size, the better (and usually more expensive) the camera.įull frame is available on models like Sony's new ZV-E1, the Canon EOS R6 II and Panasonic S5 II. With that extra quality comes a lot of extra factors to consider, however. You also get natural and not AI-generated bokeh, quicker shooting, a physical shutter, more professional video results and so on. Where smartphones have one f/stop, cameras have many, which gives you more exposure control. The larger sensors in mirrorless cameras let more light in, and you have a wide choice of lenses with far superior optics. There are a lot of reasons to choose a camera over a smartphone. See 5 more What to consider before choosing a camera
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |